Páginas

miércoles, 13 de julio de 2016

TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION

I have no a clear idea bout it,but if I have to say something I would say that this is no good for schoolers  Why?

2016, What teacher should know by Debruyckere Kirschner and Hulshof
Myth 1: New technology is causing a revolution in education. 

In 1983, Richard Clark published a definitive study on how it was pedagogy (i.e., teaching practice) and not the medium (i.e., technological tools and resources, such as whiteboards, hand-held devices, blogs, chat boards) that made a difference in learning, stating that instructional media are “mere vehicles that deliver instruction but do not influence student achievement any more than the truck that delivers our groceries causes changes in our nutrition.”  
(...) Clark and David Feldon confirm that the effectiveness of learning is determined primarily by the way the medium is used and by the quality of the instruction accompanying that use. When media (or multimedia) are used for instruction, the choice of medium does not influence learning. John Hattie described, for example, how instructional methods that are more effective within conventional environments, such as learner control and explanative feedback, are also more effective within computer-based environments 


Ask the cognitive science, Amercian Educator, 2010  Have the technology and multitasking rewired the students ?  by Daniel T Willingham. SUniversity 

REVISTA http://www.apamonitor-digital.org/apamonitor/201509?search_term=Learn&doc_id=-1&search_term=Learn&pg=57#pg57 

BANDURA SAYS THAT THE STUDENTS WHO BELIEVE IN THEIR OWN ABILITY TO LEARN  ARE MORE LIKELY TO SUCCEED ACADEMICALLY  

ADULTS https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/dunlosky.pdf 

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario