Páginas

martes, 23 de mayo de 2017

EEUU LOOKING FOR A NEW SCHOOL: LOOK BEYOND THE TRADITIONALO SCHOOLL MODEL



Education debates in the United States often occur between two poles. On the one hand, we have the libertarian impulse, which valorizes free markets, competition, and parental choice; on the other, we find a visceral defense of the district school. Middle paths, such as the urban district portfolio model, combine school choice and government accountability. These three visions for public education generate conflicts that are politically charged, and carry high stakes in terms of legitimacy and financial support.

But these conflicts operate within the same conceptual framework: Public education is the neighborhood school, and all alternatives must be justified against it—if they are to be supported at all. The result is entrenched competition between entire school sectors, such as charter versus district, public versus private. Every time we read, “Vouchers don’t work,” or “Charter schools take funding from public schools,” we see evidence of the underlying framework. District schools are the cultural norm; charter schools and private-school-scholarship programs assert legitimacy on the basis of superior academic results
(...)


A deeper debate, therefore, would not merely endorse new types of schools and models, but would call the existing framework into question. Changing the cultural norm from uniformity to pluralism would engage with theory, practice, and political compromise, to be sure. But the end result might be the creation of more nimble (ÁGIL, VELOZ), responsive, and high-quality school systems that prepare the next generation of American citizens.
To improve education in America. Look beyond the traditional school model by Ashley Berner




The Democratic Party paved the way for the education secretary's efforts to privatize our public schools.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario